If you forgot, I purpose that child actors need to consider themselves as a role model because of the influence they provide to the adolescents.
While reading my opponents opening statement, I realized that she does not have a statistics or sources that back-up her statement. Are these all lies? Assumptions? This shows that she did not have any proof that a child actor should not be required to be a role models- assuming it would strip away the actors of their freedom. Do not you already think their freedom is already tooken away when they became actors?
Near the end of her opening statement, Carly states:
Miley Cyrus may soon enough look back and realize that she was out-of-control back then and was a bad influenced to many, or she could continue the way she is and possibly get involved in worse things.
This gives the perception that Carly understands the bad influence Miley Cyrus is providing the adolescents. What doe not make sense to me is that Carly is purposing child actors should have to be role models, but states above that Miley Cyrus will one-day realize her out-of-control self and conclude she actually was a bad influence. This portrays that her statement is a logical fallacies. She agreed with my statement, but still wanted to imply that she still should be free. It was very confusing. Why would you want too counter your evidence?
Carly also states her opinions as facts with proof, which make her argument weak and unpersuasive. When she states:
Miley Cyrus has released photos when she behaved inappropriately in the way she dressed and her behavior.
As her opponent, this quote is very essential. But, because she did not give me an exact source for the people who say this, I cannot research. Also, she counter argues her statement. You say she can do whatever she wants, but, yet, you tell your audience that she dresses inappropriately. How does this support your argument?
As a result, Carly's statement has given me the proof and logic that child actors should not be role models to our young generation. Especially, because she did not provide ANY examples, evidence, and sources for me, as her opponent, to look at.
No comments:
Post a Comment